MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, much easier to write, simpler to read.
PARAGRAPH 1 experience that is practical contacts, face to face skills. EG: Studies through the UK Government show graduates with work experience are twice as prone to find employment…..
Better preparation, possiblity to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and sector that is private helps student decide on future before committing long term, EG 1/6 students can change their higher education course while at uni….
Lots of people believe that it’s far better to learn something in a combined group instead of individually. Would you agree or disagree?
Agree – learning in group has many advantages
Elements of teamwork can be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise
Disagree – Individualism is better
Self reliant, own the result, not based upon others
More mature way, more responsible
Topic and Answer: Education (child)
Some people believe that children needs to do organised activities in their leisure time while some genuinely believe that children should be liberated to do what they need to complete in their free time. Which viewpoint can you agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to guide your answer.
PARAGRAPH 1 favour that is-In of them choose.
-benefits letting your brain wonder, children can go to town, find themselves, do whatever they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent tests also show 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it will be unfair for this minority.
PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the school
-need time to plan‘equipment that is-possible to get
-furthermore studies show that mental performance operates better after a distraction from an organized task such as for example studying.
Topic and Answer: Globalisation
Many people say that globalisation while the growing amount of multinational companies have a negative effect on environmental surroundings. Which viewpoint do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. As to what extent can you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to aid your role.
PARAGRAPH 1 -DEFINITELY DAMAGING THE ENVIRONMENTAL SURROUNDINGS
-Increased interaction between countries
-Increase in products or services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop associated with world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these may have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP gulf coast of florida, oil spill, destroyed the ecosystem that is local…
Scientists think that so that you can protect environmental surroundings, people must use less energy within their daily lives. However, a lot of people have not changed the real way they live. Why do you might think many people have not taken action that is individual? What could be done to cause them to become take action?
Ideas for body paragraph 1
Not taken action that is individual:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy regarding the commons
– Collective problem – much easier to shirk responsibility
Ideas for body paragraph 2
What might be done to cause them to become take action?
– Media campaigns by the federal government
– Tax or incentives that are financial In Tokyo ……
Some think that is the responsibility of individuals to deal with the environmental surroundings. Others say it will be the national government that should be careful of the environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
People should take care of the environmental surroundings because:
we have been the consumers, we vote with our wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – consumers are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)
Government should look after the environment because:
they will have the charged power to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
said to be guardians of the country, this means collectively they truly are guardians of this earth… yet not true in fact
Both should really be doing more!
In lots of countries small shops and town centers are getting away from business, because individuals tend to drive to your large out-of-town stores. This results in an increase in car use, essay writing service and in addition it means that people without cars have limited usage of out-of-town stores. You think features of such development outweigh its disadvantages?