The Conclusions and Recommendations could be combined or, in long reports, presented in separate sections.

The Conclusions and Recommendations could be combined or, in long reports, presented in separate sections.

Conclusions and recommendations

If there aren’t any recommendations to be manufactured because of the project, call this section just Conclusions.

The Conclusions section sums up one of the keys points of the discussion, the essential popular features of your design, or the significant outcomes of your investigation. As the function is always to round the story off of your project, it should:

  • be written to relate straight to the aims associated with project as previously mentioned within the Introduction
  • indicate the extent to which the aims have already been achieved
  • summarise the findings that are key outcomes or information in your report
  • acknowledge limitations while making recommendations for future work (where applicable)
  • Highlight the usefulness or significance of the work.

The conclusions should relate with the aims associated with the work:

The purpose of this project is to design a cell phone tower for a suburban location..

The cell phone tower presented here can be erected safely in a suburban street.

It entails a total part of no more than 2m 2 l, and has the following safety features.

This investigation will review the quantity of passengers making use of the Monash University Clayton-Caulfield inter-campus bus in order to recommend adjustments towards the service if needed.

Analysis associated with survey data obtained in this project indicates that use of the Clayton-Caulfield inter-campus bus has increased by 24% in past times 5 years. It is strongly suggested that frequency be increased during peak usage.

The Conclusions section below is from a known level 2 Civil Engineering Alternative Designs report presenting two designs for a an overpass bridge. Go through the buttons that are coloured start to see the comments.


Each one of the two bridge designs Lecturer’s comment:
An elegant beginning for a Conclusions follows on neatly from the discussion that is preceding. In this full case, in addition indicates that the aims associated with project have now been met. presented in this report fulfil the criteria specified into the project brief. Both designs review Lecturer’s comment:
The main findings or outcomes – in this case one of the keys attributes of the designs – are then recapped. Incorporate piers that are round piled foundations, which are used since the soil conditions are unknown and perhaps unstable. Design 1, a simple i-girder that is composite, has the benefit of being made of steel and therefore has longer spans and fewer piers.

Design 2, a super-T beam br >Design 2 Lecturer’s comment:
The need for the results – in this situation the last recommendation – is obviously stated. is therefore recommended. It gives Lecturer’s comment:
To finish off, the achievement of the project is reinforced. an inexpensive overpass with superior durability, and fully meets what’s needed regarding the design brief.

Always address limitations and suggest how they may be overcome in future work. The below that is excerpt from the Conclusions of a written report on a project investigating the result of pulsation on heat transfer in horizontal pipe flow.

Experimental results Lecturer’s comment:
Key conclusions drawn from the project. showed that pulsed flow without flow reversal had no significant effect compared with steady flow. Preliminary experiments with reversed flow, however, clearly indicated increased heat transfer. This is certainly likely due Lecturer’s comment:
Provide a possible explanation for notable results, especially unexpected ones. to the large disturbances within the hydrodynamic boundary layer if the flow changes direction. Further research Lecturer’s comment:
Recommend further research to handle any extra work you think will be useful. is preferred to determine the maximum achievable enhancement.

It must be noted that Lecturer’s comment:
Acknowledge limitations or errors and suggest explanations solutions that are and/or. the experimental results usually do not agree with the equations that are theoretical. This can be because of the deposits which developed in the pipe, or even to inconsistent thermocouple temperature. Therefore, regular inspection associated with test rig is preferred.

For a rather report that is long it is acceptable to present the conclusions and recommendations in point form:

The prototype robot courier presented here has been confirmed to be capable of delivering documents autonomously in an working office environment. It has demonstrated listed here components of mobile robotics:

  1. Localisation: The Kalman localisation that is filter-based achieved sub-centimeter accuracy under normal operating conditions.
  2. Environment modelling: The occupancy map was updated dynamically to incorporate obstacles not included in the map that is original.
  3. Path planning: A distance transform-based path planner using obstacle transforms produced a globally optimal local entrapment-free path to the goal.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *